Browse tables for the 7 lg paper

These are supplementary materials for the following article (please quote).

List of Tables on this page:

Table 1: Characteristics of the seven participating languages
Table 2: Sources of Object-Naming Stimuli
Table 3: Summary Statistics for Correctness in the Different Languages
Table 4: Summary Statistics for Name Agreement in the Different Languages
Table 5: Summary Statistics for Mean Reaction Time in the Different Languages

Back to the List of ALL tables
Download tables


Table 1
Characteristics  of the seven participating languages

view table


Table 2
Sources of Object-Naming Stimuli

SOURCE:

N°

Snodgrass & Vanderwart, 19801

174

Alterations of Snodgrass & Vanderwart1

2

Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 19812

62

Alterations of Peabody Pict. Vocab. Test, 19812

8

Martinez - Dronkers set3

39

Abbate & La Chapelle "Pictures Please", 19844,5

168

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics6

20

Boston Naming Test, 19837

5

Oxford "One Thousand Pictures"8

25

Miscellaneous

17

1Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.

2Dunn, Lloyd M., & Dunn, Leota M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test -- Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

3Picture set used by Martinez , V. A. & Dronkers, N.

4Abbate, M.S., & La Chapelle, N.B. (1984a). Pictures, please! An articulation supplement. Communication Skill Builders, Inc.

5Abbate, M.S., & La Chapelle, N.B. (1984b). Pictures, please! A language supplement. Communication Skill Builders, Inc.

6Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Postbus 310, NL- 6500 AH Nijmegen , The Netherlands

7Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lee & Febiger.

8 Oxford Junior Workbooks. Oxford University Press , UK (1965).


Table 3
Summary Statistics for Correctness in the Different Languages

 

 

English

German

Spanish

Italian

Bulgarian

Hungarian

Chinese

% Valid response

F = 89.56

(p < .001)

Mean

96.1%

94.7%

93.2%

92.0%

89.2%

94.1%

89.3%

SD

6.0%

9.6%

10.3%

10.9%

11.1%

8.2%

11.9%

Range

60-100%

  17-100%

34-100%

18-100%

20-100%

22-100%

22-100%

% No response

F = 35.60

(p < .001)

Mean

2.3%

3.3%

5.2%

5.5%

5.1%

2.2%

4.6%

SD

5.0%

8.8%

9.6%

9.9%

10.0%

6.7%

10.1%

Range

0-34%

  0-80%

0-66%

0-80%

0-78%

0-74%

0-76%

% Invalid response

F = 191.64

(p < .001)

Mean

1.5%

2.0%

1.6%

2.5%

5.7%

3.7%

6.1%

SD

2.3%

3.0%

2.1%

2.8%

4.5%

3.3%

4.2%

Range

0-16%

  0-20%

0-14%

0-14%

0-32%

0-20%

0-22%


Table 4
Summary Statistics for Name Agreement in the Different Languages

 

 

English

German

Spanish

Italian

Bulgarian

Hungarian

Chinese

Number of types
F = 58.43
(p < .001)

Mean

3.35

5.14*

4.15

4.39

3.82

4.16

5.47

SD

2.28

3.42*

2.91

2.85

2.56

2.96

3.63

Range

1-18

1.7-21.7*

1-17

1-20

1-14

1-21

1-21
H statistics
F = 46.65
(p < .001)

Mean

0.67

0.76

0.86

0.95

0.84

0.91

1.16

SD

0.61

0.68

0.72

0.73

0.65

0.73

0.79

Range

0-2.90

0-3.28

0-2.90

0-3.47

0-2.70

0-3.52

0-3.57
%Lex 1 dominant
F = 32.83
(p < .001)

Mean

85.0%

81.1%

80.0%

77.0%

80.2%

78.0%

71.9%

SD

16.4%

19.9%

20.4%

21.6%

20.4%

21.3%

23.3%

Range

28-100%

21-100%

17-100%

12-100%

13-100%

13-100%

11-100%
%Lex 2 phonetic var.
F = 21.64
(p < .001)

Mean

3.7%

4.4%

3.2%

4.9%

4.1%

7.1%

8.5%

SD

8.7%

10.0%

8.4%

10.4%

9.8%

12.9%

12.4%

Range

28-100%

21-100%

17-100%

12-100%

13-100%

13-100%

11-100%
%Lex 3 synonym
F = 11.78
(p < .001)

Mean

2.4%

3.2%

4.2%

5.2%

2.5%

4.3%

1.6%

SD

7.7%

8.4%

10.1%

11.0%

7.7%

10.2%

5.5%

Range

28-100%

21-100%

17-100%

12-100%

13-100%

13-100%

11-100%
%Lex 4erroneous
F = 29.19
(p < .001)

Mean

9.0%

11.4%

12.7%

12.9%

13.3%

10.6%

18.0%

SD

12.4%

16.4%

16.2%

16.4%

17.4%

16.2%

19.8%

Range

28-100%

21-100%

17-100%

12-100%

13-100%

13-100%

11-100%
Same Name
X2 = 91.2
(p < .001)

Mean

4.6%

8.3%

12.1%

8.7%

12.9%

14.0%

19.6%

Range

0-1

0-1

0-1

0-1

0-1

0-1

0-1

*Since data was collected from only 30 subjects in German language, the number of alternative types were calculated as:
(raw type number x 50/30)


Table 5
Summary Statistics for Mean Reaction Time in the Different Languages

 

 

English

German

Spanish

Italian

Bulgarian

Hungarian

Chinese

RT total
F = 136.76
(p < .001)

Mean

1041

1130

1168

1163

1254

1105

1241

SD

230

281

280

270

283

281

319

Range

656-1843

663-2397

711-2063

694-2580

768-2373

659-2300

686-2389
RT target
F = 115.00
(p < .001)

Mean

1019

1101

1139

1133

1217

1071

1200

SD

211

273

262

264

261

268

312

Range

656-1823

663-3117

711-2392

694-2831

768-2273

659-3139

686-2403


Back to the List of ALL tables
Download tables