|
|
|
|
Table 31*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in English
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in English)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
-.09* |
+.10* |
-.13** |
+.16** |
ns |
ns |
Syllable Type Freq. |
ns |
-.08~ |
+.12** |
-.13** |
ns |
ns |
Length in Characters |
-.16** |
+.15** |
-.09* |
+.20** |
-.11* |
+.11** |
Word Complexity |
-.19** |
+.15** |
-.10* |
+.12** |
-.11* |
ns |
Initial Frication |
+.08~ |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Word Frequency |
+.21** |
-.19** |
+.14** |
-.34** |
ns |
ns |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.39** |
-.48** |
ns |
-.57** |
+.15** |
-.16** |
Visual Complexity |
ns |
ns |
-.06~ |
ns |
ns |
-.09* |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
Table 32*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in German
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in German)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
ns |
ns |
-.17** |
+.16** |
ns |
ns |
Syllable Type Freq. |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Length in Characters |
-.08~ |
+.08~ |
-.12** |
+.17** |
ns |
ns |
Word Complexity |
ns |
ns |
-.13** |
+.09* |
+.09* |
ns |
Initial Frication |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
+.12** |
Word Frequency |
+.20** |
-.18** |
+.14** |
-.32** |
ns |
ns |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.27** |
-.37** |
ns |
-.49** |
ns |
ns |
Visual Complexity |
ns |
ns |
-.09* |
ns |
-.08~ |
+.08~ |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
Table 33*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in Spanish
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in Spanish)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
-.13** |
+.12** |
-.12** |
+.13** |
-.12** |
ns |
Syllable Type Freq. |
+.12** |
-.11* |
+.12** |
-.13** |
+.14** |
-.11* |
Length in Characters |
-.13** |
+.14** |
-.12** |
+.13** |
-.13** |
+.08~ |
Word Complexity |
-.19** |
+.19** |
-.07~ |
+.14** |
-.15** |
+.14** |
Initial Frication |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Word Frequency |
+.14** |
-.17** |
+.16** |
-.24** |
ns |
ns |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.25** |
-.34** |
ns |
-.45** |
ns |
ns |
Visual Complexity |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
Table 34*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in Italian
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in Italian)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
-.18** |
+.13** |
ns |
+.14** |
-.18** |
+.18** |
Syllable Type Freq. |
+.14** |
-.09* |
ns |
-.16** |
+.14** |
-.10* |
Length in Characters |
-.18** |
+.13** |
ns |
+.14** |
-.20** |
+.21** |
Word Complexity |
-.21** |
+.15** |
ns |
+.14** |
-.19** |
+.15** |
Initial Frication |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Word Frequency |
+.22** |
-.19** |
+.10* |
-.33** |
+.15** |
-.19** |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.22** |
-.29** |
ns |
-.44** |
-.11* |
+.10* |
Visual Complexity |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
Table 35*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in Bulgarian
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in Bulgarian)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
ns |
ns |
-.16** |
ns |
ns |
+.09* |
Syllable Type Freq. |
ns |
ns |
+.08~ |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Length in Characters |
-.07~ |
ns |
-.13** |
+.10* |
-.09* |
+.10* |
Word Complexity |
ns |
ns |
-.12** |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Initial Frication |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
+.15** |
Word Frequency |
+.10* |
ns |
+.21** |
-.27** |
ns |
ns |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.27** |
-.37** |
+.09* |
-.49** |
ns |
ns |
Visual Complexity |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
+.08~ |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
Table 36*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in Hungarian
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in Hungarian)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
-.15** |
ns |
-.15** |
+.18** |
-.09* |
+.07~ |
Syllable Type Freq. |
+.15** |
-.10** |
ns |
-.10* |
+.13** |
ns |
Length in Characters |
-.16** |
ns |
-.12** |
+.21** |
-.09* |
+.10* |
Word Complexity |
-.18** |
ns |
-.09* |
+.15** |
-.13** |
ns |
Initial Frication |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
Word Frequency |
+.13** |
-.10* |
+.25** |
-.27** |
ns |
ns |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.26** |
-.37** |
+.08~ |
-.46** |
ns |
ns |
Visual Complexity |
+.08~ |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
Table 37*
Correlations of Independent with Dependent Variables in Chinese
(positive naming disparity and negative RT disparity = greater advantage in Chinese)
|
% Lex 1 |
# Types |
Sames |
RT. targ. |
Naming Disparity |
RT Disparity |
Length in Syllables |
ns |
ns |
-.18** |
+.17** |
ns |
ns |
Syllable Type Freq. |
+.06~ |
ns |
ns |
-.13** |
ns |
-.15** |
Initial Frication |
+.11* |
-.09~ |
-.10* |
ns |
+.08~ |
ns |
Word Frequency |
+.26** |
-.28** |
ns |
-.39** |
+.11* |
-.13** |
Goodness of Depiction |
+.35** |
-.39** |
ns |
-.52** |
+.08~ |
ns |
Visual Complexity |
+.09~ |
ns |
-.17** |
ns |
ns |
ns |
(levels of significance: p<0.01 level: **, p<0.05 level: *, p<0.1 level: ~)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|